RE: [PATCH] Add VT flag to cpuinfo

From: Dugger, Donald D
Date: Thu Dec 01 2005 - 11:44:57 EST


Well, I really don't see a conflict here, TLA's for x86
architectures are orthogonal to PowerPC and vice versa
so this shouldn't cause any confusion.

--
Don Dugger
"Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse." - D. Gale
Donald.D.Dugger@xxxxxxxxx
Ph: (303)440-1368

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Anton Blanchard [mailto:anton@xxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 9:10 AM
>To: Dugger, Donald D
>Cc: Andi Kleen; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Shah, Rajesh;
>akpm@xxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add VT flag to cpuinfo
>
>
>> Good guess. We discuessed it and decided that `vmx' was the best
>> term so I'll rework the patch to use that name.
>>
>> BTW, I don't see any reference to `vmx' in the 2.6.14 tree, is
>> this a change you recently made to your tree?
>
>Unfortunate choice of TLA, VMX is the name for the vector
>instruction set
>on powerpc (otherwise known as altivec).
>
>Anton
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/