Re: [PATCH] Fix bytecount result from printk()

[Linus Torvalds]

On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Mark Lord wrote:
> 
> On a related note, WHY does the LOG LEVEL format <6> not get
> interpreted correctly for the first printk() after an oops report?

It never gets interpreted except at the behinning of a line. Sounds like 
the oops report perhaps prints a " " without a newline or something at the 
end, so that the next message after that isn't a new line?

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/