Re: [PATCH 03/05] mm rationalize __alloc_pages ALLOC_* flag names

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Tue Nov 15 2005 - 04:03:56 EST


Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Paul Jackson wrote:
> > Rationalize mm/page_alloc.c:__alloc_pages() ALLOC flag names.
> >
>
> I don't really see the need for this. The names aren't
> clearly better, and the downside is that they move away
> from the terminlogy we've been using in the page allocator
> for the past few years.

I thought they were heaps better, actually.

-#define ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS 0x01 /* don't check watermarks at all */
-#define ALLOC_HARDER 0x02 /* try to alloc harder */
-#define ALLOC_HIGH 0x04 /* __GFP_HIGH set */
+#define ALLOC_DONT_DIP 0x01 /* don't dip into memory reserves */
+#define ALLOC_DIP_SOME 0x02 /* dip into reserves some */
+#define ALLOC_DIP_ALOT 0x04 /* dip into reserves further */
+#define ALLOC_MUSTHAVE 0x08 /* ignore all constraints */

very explicit.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/