Re: [RFC] NUMA memory policy support for HUGE pages

[Adam Litke]

On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 13:46 -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> This is V2 of the patch.
> 
> Changes:
> 
> - Cleaned up by folding find_or_alloc() into hugetlb_no_page().

IMHO this is not really a cleanup.  When the demand fault patch stack
was first accepted, we decided to separate out find_or_alloc_huge_page()
because it has the page_cache retry loop with several exit conditions.
no_page() has its own backout logic and mixing the two makes for a
tangled mess.  Can we leave that hunk out please?

-- 
Adam Litke - (agl at us.ibm.com)
IBM Linux Technology Center

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/