Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH 5/39] NLKD/x86-64 - early/late CPU up/down notification

[Andi Kleen]

On Monday 14 November 2005 09:04, Jan Beulich wrote:

> Assuming you mean CPU_ONLINE and CPU_DEAD. 

Yes

> But no, I don't really like 
> this. The most significant difference is that the existing notifications
> are not sent on the starting CPU, but on the one it got started from.
> The point in time is only the second reason for not using these.

Ok, I can see your point. Let's say a new notifier for that would
be ok if you can find at least one other existing in tree user and 
convert it  to it. Does that sound fair? 

Note I'm about to remove the IO apic watchdog setup, so that one
doesn't count.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/