Re: [PATCH 2.6.14-rt11 2/3] Switch to using get_cycles() rather than get_cpu_tick()

[Ingo Molnar]

* Tom Rini <trini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> In a few different drivers we had what boiled down to a custom 
> implementation of get_cycles().  On i386 and ppc32 this was the same 
> code, and I assume similar for ARM and MIPS.  In one case 
> (kernel/latency.c) it really was get_cycles() in the !i386 case.  
> Always using get_cycles() makes new platform bringup easier.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

thanks, applied.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/