Re: [PATCH 10/15] mm: atomic64 page counts

[Christoph Lameter]

On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Hugh Dickins wrote:

> I've nothing against zero page refcounting avoidance, just wanted
> numbers to show it's more worth doing than not doing.  And I'm not
> the only one to have wondered, if it is an issue, wouldn't big NUMA
> benefit more from per-node zero pages anyway?  (Though of course
> the pages themselves should stay clean, so won't be bouncing.)

Per-node zero pages sound good. The page structs are placed on the 
respective nodes and therefore would not bounce.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/