Re: [PATCH 01/15] mm: poison struct page for ptlock

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 01:37:19PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> > spinlock in struct page, and the size of the spinlock varies a lot according
> > to config.  The only >wordsize version we really care about is
> > CONFIG_PREEMPT, NR_CPUS >= 4.  (which distros don't ship...)
> 
> Suse, Debian and Redhat ship such kernels.

No.  SuSE and Redhat have always been smart enough to avoid CONFIG_PREEMPT
like the plague, and even Debian finally noticed this a few month ago.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/