Re: New Linux Development Model

[Ian Kumlien]

On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 19:29 +0000, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
> On Thursday 10 November 2005 15:10, Mark Lord wrote:
> [snip]
> > But things just got WAY more complicated for most users of ipw2200.
> > Sure, they can ignore us and just continue to run their old vendor
> > kernels.  But this means they don't get up-to-date kernels with
> > bug fixes and security fixes.  And more importantly to LKML,
> > we've now just cut off a potentially large crowd of kernel-testers.
> >
> > Ugh.  Ugly.
> 
> I completely agree with this assessment, I was merely defending the "linux 
> development process" which I do not believe to be at fault here.

It isn't, this started as a mail from someone, and was continued because
ipw* and ieee* things was mentioned. I really hope that a newer version
is merged... It can be branded experimental and all... =)

-- 
Ian Kumlien <pomac () vapor ! com> -- http://pomac.netswarm.net

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part