Re: [PATCH 3/4] Hugetlb: Reorganize hugetlb_fault to prepare for COW

From: William Lee Irwin III
Date: Wed Nov 09 2005 - 19:13:51 EST


On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 05:38:47PM -0600, Adam Litke wrote:
> Hugetlb: Reorganize hugetlb_fault to prepare for COW
> This patch splits the "no_page()" type activity into its own function,
> hugetlb_no_page(). hugetlb_fault() becomes the entry point for hugetlb faults
> and delegates to the appropriate handler depending on the type of fault. Right
> now we still have only hugetlb_no_page() but a later patch introduces a COW
> fault.
> Original post by David Gibson <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Version 2: Wed 9 Nov 2005
> Broken out into a separate patch
> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Adam Litke <agl@xxxxxxxxxx>

Straightforward enough.

Acked-by: William Irwin <wli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/