Re: [PATCH]: Cleanup of __alloc_pages

[Rohit Seth]

On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 17:00 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:

> 
> > However, I appreciate your preference to separate cleanup from semantic
> > change.  Perhaps this means leaving the ALLOC_CPUSET flag in your
> > cleanup patch, then one of us following on top of that with a patch to
> > simplify and fix the cpuset invocation semantics and a second cleanup
> > patch to remove ALLOC_CPUSET as a separate flag.
> > 
> 
> That would be good. I'll send off a fresh patch with the
> ALLOC_WATERMARKS fixed after Rohit gets around to looking over
> it.
> 

Nick, your changes have really come out good.  Thanks.  I think it is
definitely a good starting point as it maintains all of existing
behavior.

I guess now I can argue about why we should keep the watermark low for
GFP_HIGH ;-)

Paul, sorry for troubling you with those magic numbers again in the
original patch...

-rohit

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/