Re: 2.6.14: CR4 not needed to be inspected on the 486 anymore?

[Maciej W. Rozycki]

On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Zachary Amsden wrote:

> While this is at least no worse in the nested fault case than earlier 
> kernels, I really wish I had one of those weird 486s so I could test the 
> faulting mechanism.  It seems the trap handling code has gotten quite 

 What's so weird about 486s?  Besides, for testing it doesn't have to be
one -- you will get away with a 386, too.  I have neither anymore, but
there are people around still using them.

  Maciej
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/