Re: 2.6.14: CR4 not needed to be inspected on the 486 anymore?

[Maciej W. Rozycki]

On Sat, 5 Nov 2005, Andi Kleen wrote:

> I don't think it's a good idea. Relying on nested faults in oops
> is a bit unsafe because it could lead to recursive faults in the worst case. 

 Good point.

> Better keep the if

 Except the condition is wrong.  Presence of CR4 could be tested elsewhere
though, with the result being the condition here.

  Maciej
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/