Re: [PATCH] Eagle and ADI 930 usb adsl modem driver

From: matthieu castet
Date: Sun Nov 06 2005 - 13:46:12 EST


Hi Greg,

matthieu castet wrote:

+ *
+ * This software is available to you under a choice of one of two
+ * licenses. You may choose to be licensed under the terms of the GNU
+ * General Public License (GPL) Version 2, available from the file
+ * COPYING in the main directory of this source tree, or the
+ * BSD license below:
+ *
+ * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+ * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
+ * are met:



<snip> You don't need the whole GPL 2 copy here, just put the first
paragraph you have before this one in.

The paragraph you quote is the BSD licence, and point 1 is :
Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
* notice unmodified, this list of conditions, and the following
* disclaimer

So could I remove it ?



diff -rNu -x '*.ko*' -x '*.mod*' -x '*.o*' linux-2.6.14/drivers/usb/atm.old/ueagle-atm.h linux-2.6.14/drivers/usb/atm/ueagle-atm.h
--- linux-2.6.14/drivers/usb/atm.old/ueagle-atm.h 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.14/drivers/usb/atm/ueagle-atm.h 2005-10-30 00:25:27.000000000 +0200



Why do you need a header file for a single .c file?

I think it makes things cleaner. I even like the bsd style where there is an header for reg (hardware values) and an other for val (driver structures).


We patched our driver with the comments sent, but we still don't know what to do with this 2 points :
- For the license stuff, all the dual bsd/gpl drivers I saw in the kernel tree have the complete bsd header.
- For the header file I prefer a separate header file, but if Linux policy is to merge header and source file, that's fine.


Regards,

Matthieu
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/