Re: [PATCH 66/82] remove linux/version.h from fs/hfs/

From: Eric Piel
Date: Sat Nov 05 2005 - 12:37:16 EST


10.07.2005 21:36, Olaf Hering wrote/a Ãcrit:
changing CONFIG_LOCALVERSION rebuilds too much, for no appearent reason.
Hello,

I've just changed LOCALVERSION on 2.6.14 and noticed that the patches for hfs and hfsplus had still not made their way. As I couldn't find any tree which contains them, I was wondering if they wouldn't have been "lost in space" ?

Eric


Signed-off-by: Olaf Hering <olh@xxxxxxx>

fs/hfs/hfs_fs.h | 1 -
fs/hfs/inode.c | 1 -
2 files changed, 2 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6.13-rc2-mm1/fs/hfs/hfs_fs.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.13-rc2-mm1.orig/fs/hfs/hfs_fs.h
+++ linux-2.6.13-rc2-mm1/fs/hfs/hfs_fs.h
@@ -9,7 +9,6 @@
#ifndef _LINUX_HFS_FS_H
#define _LINUX_HFS_FS_H

-#include <linux/version.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/types.h>
#include <linux/buffer_head.h>
Index: linux-2.6.13-rc2-mm1/fs/hfs/inode.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.13-rc2-mm1.orig/fs/hfs/inode.c
+++ linux-2.6.13-rc2-mm1/fs/hfs/inode.c
@@ -12,7 +12,6 @@
*/

#include <linux/pagemap.h>
-#include <linux/version.h>
#include <linux/mpage.h>

#include "hfs_fs.h"

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/