Re: [PATCH] [IPV4] Fix secondary IP addresses after promotion

[Thomas Graf]

* Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> 2005-11-05 05:28
> The reason why all routes are deleted is because their prefered
> source addresses is the primary address. fn_flush_list should
> probably send the missing notifications for the deleted routes.
> Changing address promotion to not delete the other routes at all
> looks extremly complicated, I think just fixing it to behave
> correctly is good enough (which my patch didn't do entirely,
> I'll send a new one this weekend).

Yes, fib_sync_down(), but even when I remove the code setting
RTNH_F_DEAD I still see _some_ local routes disappearing which
I cannot explain right now. I can only reproduce this with
!CONFIG_IP_MULTIPLE_TABLES though.

Assuming this is a separate bug, I'm not sure if this is the right
way to fix it. I think it would be better to rewrite the preferred
source address of all related local routes and only perform a
remove-and-add on the secondary address being promoted.

_If_ we let them die, we should announce it in fib_sync_down()
rather then in the algorithm specific flush routines.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/