[PATCH 1/9] kconfig: Fix Kconfig performance bug

From: Roman Zippel
Date: Thu Nov 03 2005 - 10:06:15 EST


From: David Gibson <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

When doing its recursive dependency check, scripts/kconfig/conf uses
the flag SYMBOL_CHECK_DONE to avoid rechecking a symbol it has already
checked. However, that flag is only set at the top level, so if a
symbol is first encountered as a dependency of another symbol it will
be rechecked every time it is encountered until it's encountered at
the top level.

This patch adjusts the flag setting so that each symbol will only be
checked once, regardless of whether it is first encountered at the top
level, or while recursing down from another symbol. On complex
configurations, this vastly speeds up scripts/kconfig/conf. The
config in the powerpc merge tree is particularly bad: this patch
reduces the time for 'scripts/kconfig/conf -o arch/powerpc/Kconfig' by
a factor of 40 on a G5. That's even including the time to print the
config, so the speedup in the actual checking is more likely 2 or 3
orders of magnitude.

Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Roman Zippel <zippel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---

scripts/kconfig/expr.h | 1 -
scripts/kconfig/symbol.c | 11 ++++++++---
scripts/kconfig/zconf.tab.c_shipped | 5 +----
scripts/kconfig/zconf.y | 5 +----
4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/scripts/kconfig/expr.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/scripts/kconfig/expr.h 2005-11-03 13:10:15.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6/scripts/kconfig/expr.h 2005-11-03 13:10:24.000000000 +0100
@@ -93,7 +93,6 @@ struct symbol {
#define SYMBOL_NEW 0x0800
#define SYMBOL_AUTO 0x1000
#define SYMBOL_CHECKED 0x2000
-#define SYMBOL_CHECK_DONE 0x4000
#define SYMBOL_WARNED 0x8000

#define SYMBOL_MAXLENGTH 256
Index: linux-2.6/scripts/kconfig/symbol.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/scripts/kconfig/symbol.c 2005-11-03 13:10:15.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6/scripts/kconfig/symbol.c 2005-11-03 13:10:24.000000000 +0100
@@ -731,12 +731,12 @@ struct symbol *sym_check_deps(struct sym
struct symbol *sym2;
struct property *prop;

- if (sym->flags & SYMBOL_CHECK_DONE)
- return NULL;
if (sym->flags & SYMBOL_CHECK) {
printf("Warning! Found recursive dependency: %s", sym->name);
return sym;
}
+ if (sym->flags & SYMBOL_CHECKED)
+ return NULL;

sym->flags |= (SYMBOL_CHECK | SYMBOL_CHECKED);
sym2 = sym_check_expr_deps(sym->rev_dep.expr);
@@ -756,8 +756,13 @@ struct symbol *sym_check_deps(struct sym
goto out;
}
out:
- if (sym2)
+ if (sym2) {
printf(" %s", sym->name);
+ if (sym2 == sym) {
+ printf("\n");
+ sym2 = NULL;
+ }
+ }
sym->flags &= ~SYMBOL_CHECK;
return sym2;
}
Index: linux-2.6/scripts/kconfig/zconf.tab.c_shipped
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/scripts/kconfig/zconf.tab.c_shipped 2005-11-03 13:10:15.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6/scripts/kconfig/zconf.tab.c_shipped 2005-11-03 13:10:24.000000000 +0100
@@ -1933,10 +1933,7 @@ void conf_parse(const char *name)
exit(1);
menu_finalize(&rootmenu);
for_all_symbols(i, sym) {
- if (!(sym->flags & SYMBOL_CHECKED) && sym_check_deps(sym))
- printf("\n");
- else
- sym->flags |= SYMBOL_CHECK_DONE;
+ sym_check_deps(sym);
}

sym_change_count = 1;
Index: linux-2.6/scripts/kconfig/zconf.y
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/scripts/kconfig/zconf.y 2005-11-03 13:10:15.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6/scripts/kconfig/zconf.y 2005-11-03 13:10:24.000000000 +0100
@@ -495,10 +495,7 @@ void conf_parse(const char *name)
exit(1);
menu_finalize(&rootmenu);
for_all_symbols(i, sym) {
- if (!(sym->flags & SYMBOL_CHECKED) && sym_check_deps(sym))
- printf("\n");
- else
- sym->flags |= SYMBOL_CHECK_DONE;
+ sym_check_deps(sym);
}

sym_change_count = 1;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/