Re: 2.6.14-rt1

From: Carlos Antunes
Date: Wed Nov 02 2005 - 11:07:49 EST


On 11/2/05, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Sorry I didn't get back to you sooner. I was already getting ready for
> bed last night when you sent me your program. So I'm just getting
> around to looking into this now.
>

Hey, a man has got to sleep every now and then! :-)

>
> To answer your question of why SCHED_OTHER may be preforming better than
> SCHED_FIFO (although it shouldn't), probably shows something in either
> the timing code, or the priority inheritance. Since a SCHED_OTHER
> thread will skip the PI and other things to get it to perform
> reliable.
>

And you know what? The new rt3 solved the problem. Meanig that
SCHED_FIFO now gives better results than SCHED_OTHER.


THANKS INGO! ;-)



>
> Now could you post/send your CONFIG_FILE. I'm currently getting a test
> machine ready to run your program.
>

Given rt3 changes, do you still need my config?

Thanks!

Carlos


--
"We hold [...] that all men are created equal; that they are
endowed [...] with certain inalienable rights; that among
these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness"
-- Thomas Jefferson
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/