Re: PATCH: EDAC - clean up atomic stuff

[Alan Cox]

On Mer, 2005-11-02 at 16:26 +1100, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Well if we retain KM_BOUNCE_READ then we'll need local_irq_save().  If
> edac_mc_scrub_block() will alwyas be called from process context then we
> can use KM_USER0 and leave interrupts enabled.
> 
> Alan, can you confirm please?

Probably best to local_irq_save. Especially considering the likely
direction of updates once it is merged

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/