Re: [PATCH 4/6] x86_64: fix L1_CACHE_SHIFT_MAX for Intel EM64T [for 2.6.14?]

[Andi Kleen]

> No correctness issues, obviously. So this could even be merged for 2.6.14
> (I'm not a fan of this idea, though).

I don't think it's a good idea to mess with this for 2.6.14

In general the maxaligned stuff is imho bogus and should be removed. That is 
what CONFIG_X86_GENERIC is for. It doesn't make sense imho to separate
the variables in two aligned classes - either they should be aligned in 
all cases or they shouldn't.

-Andi


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/