Re: [PATCH] vm - swap_prefetch-15
From: Con Kolivas
Date: Fri Oct 07 2005 - 07:34:03 EST
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005 22:26, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > Makes sense but it is only used in the CONFIG_SWAP_PREFETCH case so it
> > would end up as a static inline in swap.h to avoid ending being #ifdefed
> > in page_alloc.c. Do you think that's preferable to having it in
> > swap_prefetch.c ?
>
> But then you would still have to open up buffered_rmqueue() and
> zone_statistics() to everyone, no?
bah of course.. /me slaps forehead
> How about you implement a new gfp flag
> __GFP_NEVER_RECLAIM similar to __GFP_NORECLAIM instead so you don't have
> to duplicate __page_alloc()?
That will end up being far more intrusive than this version and __alloc_pages
would need more tests that affect every call to __alloc_pages which seems
much more expensive to me than exporting buffered_rmqueue and
zone_statistics, and the modified __alloc_pages will still be a much more
complicated function than prefetch_get_page.
Thanks,
Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/