Re: what's next for the linux kernel?

From: Tomasz Kłoczko
Date: Thu Oct 06 2005 - 05:45:42 EST


On Thu, 6 Oct 2005 grundig@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

El Thu, 6 Oct 2005 00:23:30 +0100,
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@xxxxxxxx> escribió:

there are a lot of legacy apps that no-one wants to modify to get them
to create/read /tmp/x-windows/.X11-unix.

What's the point of caring about security for a legacy app if nobody
is going to fix it if a security problema arises?


http://packages.debian.org/unstable/admin/libpam-tmpdir

is good enought IMO

BTW. Also it will be good say something about storing unix sockets by system programs (/tmp/x-windows/.X11-unix which is owned by root.root) in /tmp.

http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#REQUIREMENTS14
says about /var/run:
"System programs that maintain transient UNIX-domain sockets must place them in this directory."

kloczek
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
*Ludzie nie mają problemów, tylko sobie sami je stwarzają*
-----------------------------------------------------------
Tomasz Kłoczko, sys adm @zie.pg.gda.pl|*e-mail: kloczek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx*