Re: freebox possible GPL violation

[Pierre Michon]

Hi,

>Not complex enough so that a network boot protocol can't fit on a BIOS 
>chip, believe me.

So _why_ the freebox act _differently_ in the boot process when there is 
a firmware update ?
Just for the fun ?

> he only wrong assumptions that I see here are yours.
I provide facts and arguments, you provide nothing.

>I don't understand why you cannot accept that the Freebox is part of the 
>Free network infrastructure and that you are not using directly the OS 
>but only the service that they provide.
So what about _my_ wifi pcmcia card ?
What about the people who had to paid 400 euros and receive a letter
from free telling them that according to CGV there are the onwer of the
freebox (ok this one need some checks).

Again in my first post I provide facts for this (with links), you provide 
nothing than replying always the same things without arguments against
mine.


Please take my first post and reply to point A, B, C with arguments.

>'Got it, now ?
No, because you didn't answer to my questions...

Pierre

Please let's continue on legal gpl-violations.org ML.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/