Re: I request inclusion of reiser4 in the mainline kernel

[Horst von Brand]

David Masover <ninja@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Pavel Machek wrote:
> >>V3 is obsoleted by V4 in every way.  V3 is old code that should be
> >>marked as deprecated as soon as V4 has passed mass testing.   V4 is far
> >>superior in its coding style also.  Having V3 in and V4 out is at this
> >> point just stupid.

> > Really? Last time I checked, even V3's fsck was not too great. [In
> > fact I never could make it run stable enough to even _test_ it
> > properly].
> > Do you have working fsck for V4?

> Already saved me once.  But then, I should have had backups.

And if you haven't? Backing up 200+ GiB is no peanuts...

> And personally, if it was my FS, I'd stop working on fsck after it was
> able to "check".  That's what it's for.  To fix an FS, you wipe it and
> restore from backups.

Remind me /never/ to go near a filesystem you are in any way involved with.
-- 
Dr. Horst H. von Brand                   User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica                     Fono: +56 32 654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria              +56 32 654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile                Fax:  +56 32 797513
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/