Re: I request inclusion of reiser4 in the mainline kernel

[Hans Reiser]

Jens Axboe wrote:

>
>Seeing as you are the one that is apparently bothered by the misnomer,
>it follows that you would be the one submitting a patch for this. Not
>that it would be accepted though, I don't see much point in renaming
>functions and breaking drivers just because of a slightly bad name. The
>io schedulers are all called foo-iosched.c, it's only the simple core
>api that uses the 'elevator' description.
>
>  
>
He asked for an example of messy code, I gave one.  Nate can give
details on other messiness in that code.

Reiser4 has flaws also....

Give all the code time, and it will improve.  The "elevator" code has
gotten a LOT better.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/