Re: Intermittent NAT failure when multiple hosts send UDP packets

From: Bernardo Innocenti
Date: Sat Sep 17 2005 - 21:41:22 EST


Never mind, it was fixed in 2.6.13, probably by this patch:

https://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-devel/2004-March/014412.html


Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> This smells like a bug in UDP ip_nat_proto_udp.c or nearby.
> I'm seeing this on 2.6.12-1.1447_FC4, but code in 2.6.13 is
> still the same.
>
> I've setup SNAT the usual way:
>
> iptables -A POSTROUTING -t nat -o ppp0 -j SNAT --to-source 151.38.19.110
>
> When multiple clients in the LAN send UDP packets to the same port of
> the same remote host, I see something like this in my /proc/net/ip_conntrack:
>
> udp 17 170 src=10.3.3.2 dst=194.185.88.60 sport=5060 dport=5060 src=194.185.88.60 dst=151.38.19.110 sport=5060 dport=5060 [ASSURED] use=1
> udp 17 29 src=10.3.3.2 dst=212.97.59.76 sport=5060 dport=5060 [UNREPLIED] src=212.97.59.76 dst=151.38.19.110 sport=5060 dport=5060 use=1
> udp 17 177 src=10.3.3.250 dst=194.185.88.60 sport=5060 dport=5060 src=194.185.88.60 dst=151.38.19.110 sport=5060 dport=1024 [ASSURED] use=1
>
> In the last line, the destination port has been properly remapped from
> 5060 to 1024 to distingish between incoming packets.
>
> However, I see packets going out over ppp0 without the source
> address properly rewritten to 151.38.19.110:
>
> 04:38:28.739514 IP 10.3.3.2.5060 > 194.185.88.60.5060: UDP, length 536
>
> This doesn't happen when there's just a single host sending to port 5060.
> Sometimes I must restart the interface to trigger this bug.

--
// Bernardo Innocenti - Develer S.r.l., R&D dept.
\X/ http://www.develer.com/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/