[PATCH 09/11] [PATCH] Fix MPOL_F_VERIFY

From: Chris Wright
Date: Wed Sep 14 2005 - 20:07:22 EST


-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------

There was a pretty bad bug in there that the code would
always check the full VMA, not the range the user requested.

When the VMA to be checked was merged with the previous VMA this
could lead to spurious failures.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxx>
---
mm/mempolicy.c | 7 ++++++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: linux-2.6.13.y/mm/mempolicy.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.13.y.orig/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ linux-2.6.13.y/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -333,8 +333,13 @@ check_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsign
if (prev && prev->vm_end < vma->vm_start)
return ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
if ((flags & MPOL_MF_STRICT) && !is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma)) {
+ unsigned long endvma = vma->vm_end;
+ if (endvma > end)
+ endvma = end;
+ if (vma->vm_start > start)
+ start = vma->vm_start;
err = check_pgd_range(vma->vm_mm,
- vma->vm_start, vma->vm_end, nodes);
+ start, endvma, nodes);
if (err) {
first = ERR_PTR(err);
break;

--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/