Re: [patch] hdaps driver update.

[Greg KH]

On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 12:31:57PM -0400, Robert Love wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 09:16 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> 
> > But you are reference counting a static object, right?  Which
> > isn't the nicest thing to have done.
> 
> I would not say it is not "the nicest thing", it is just not necessary
> to do the reference counting.  But we want the ref counting for other
> reasons, so it seems sensible.

Like was mentioned, please use platform_device_register_simple()
instead, that's what it is there for.

> > No, if you have that .owner field in your driver, you get a symlink in
> > sysfs that points from your driver to the module that controls it.  You
> > just removed that symlink, which is not what I think you wanted to have
> > happen :(
> 
> But device release == module unload.

Sure.

> I am not following, sadly.

Load the version of the driver in 2.6.14-rc1.  Look in the /sys/
directory for where your driver shows up.  You should see a symlink
called "module" in there that points back to /sys/module/ for where your
module lives.  That symlink was created by the fact that you had set the
.owner field in the struct device_driver.

Taking that field away like you did removes that symlink, which is not a
good thing.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/