Re: Pure 64 bootloaders

From: Stephen Frost
Date: Sun Sep 11 2005 - 06:53:26 EST


* Andi Kleen (ak@xxxxxxx) wrote:
> Jim Gifford <maillist@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > I have been working on a project to create a Pure 64 bit distro of
> > linux, nothing 32 bit in the system. I can accomplish that with no
>
> Hopefully you're using /lib64 for that, otherwise your
> packages will be incompatible to everybody else and not
> FHS compliant. If you don't please don't submit any
> patches to hardcode this to upstream packages.

/lib64 sucks, as mentioned, and I thought FHS only required that the
linker be in /lib64. Thus, the actual libraries could be pretty much
anywhere (as it should be, really). Debian-amd64 uses a symlink from
/lib64 to /lib and provides the 64bit libraries and linker in /lib (but
when actually compiling does link binaries through /lib64 for FHS
compliance).

Hopefully /lib64, et al, will die and multiarch will happen soon.

Thanks,

Stephen

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature