Re: [PATCH 2.6.13-stable] cpuset semaphore double trip fix

[Paul Jackson]

Chris wrote:
> OK, we can hold until you find a good case for triggering ;-)

Agreed.

By the way, you or Randy mentioned something about leaving a mention of
-stable in the MAINTAINERS file.

That wouldn't have helped me this week, but if you had put the string:

	Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt

somewhere in the opening text of the messages that announce stable
reviews, that would have saved me some time.  I have in mind the
lkml messages such as:

	From: Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxx>
	To: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, stable@xxxxxxxxxx
	Subject: [PATCH 0/9] -stable review
	
	This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.13.1 release.

Just a thought ...

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/