Re: [PATCH] minor ELF definitions addition

[Jan Beulich]

>>> Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 08.09.05 16:32:16 >>>
>On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 04:30:03PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> (Note: Patch also attached because the inline version is certain to
get
>> line wrapped.)
>> 
>> A trivial addition to the EFL definitions.
>
>Why?  They're obviously not needed in kernelspace..

I have dependent code (on STT_COMMON), and am in the process of
breaking this up. Since the definition doesn't hurt anyone (and I need
it), I can't see why it can't be there; I agree that STT_TLS will rarely
be needed in kernel code, but I still decided to also add this for
completeness.

>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> diff -Npru 2.6.13/include/linux/elf.h
2.6.13-elf/include/linux/elf.h
>> --- 2.6.13/include/linux/elf.h	2005-08-29 01:41:01.000000000
+0200
>> +++ 2.6.13-elf/include/linux/elf.h	2005-03-16 12:24:42.000000000
>> +0100
>> @@ -150,6 +150,8 @@ typedef __s64	Elf64_Sxword;
>>  #define STT_FUNC    2
>>  #define STT_SECTION 3
>>  #define STT_FILE    4
>> +#define STT_COMMON  5
>> +#define STT_TLS     6
>>  
>>  #define ELF_ST_BIND(x)		((x) >> 4)
>>  #define ELF_ST_TYPE(x)		(((unsigned int) x) & 0xf)
>> 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/