Re: 2.6.13-rc7 qla2xxx unaligned accesses

From: Andrew Vasquez
Date: Fri Aug 26 2005 - 21:20:12 EST


On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, Keith Owens wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 11:22:52 -0700,
> Andrew Vasquez <andrew.vasquez@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Keith Owens wrote:
> >
> >> 2.6.13-rc7 + kdb on ia64. The qla2xxx drivers are getting unaligned
> >> accesses at startup.
> >>
> >> qla2300 0000:01:02.0: Found an ISP2312, irq 66, iobase 0xc00000080f300000
> >> qla2300 0000:01:02.0: Configuring PCI space...
> >> PCI: slot 0000:01:02.0 has incorrect PCI cache line size of 0 bytes, correcting to 128
> >> qla2300 0000:01:02.0: Configure NVRAM parameters...
> >> qla2300 0000:01:02.0: Verifying loaded RISC code...
> >> qla2300 0000:01:02.0: Waiting for LIP to complete...
> >> qla2300 0000:01:02.0: Cable is unplugged...
> >> scsi1 : qla2xxx
> >> kernel unaligned access to 0xe00000300667800c, ip=0xa0000001005cd0b1
> >
> >Yes, I have a fix for this in my patch-queue. I'll attach it here for
> >reference. I'll forward onto linux-scsi post 2.6.13.
> >
> >--
> >av
> >
> >---
> >
> >On some platforms the hard-casting of the 8 byte node_name
> >and port_name arrays to an u64 would cause unaligned-access
> >warnings. Generalize the conversions with consistent
> >shifting of WWN bytes.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Andrew Vasquez <andrew.vasquez@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >---
> >
> > drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_attr.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++----------
> > 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> >24e16c86578498fd71a3e33bebbd8be7323a03c6
> >diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_attr.c b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_attr.c
> >--- a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_attr.c
> >+++ b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_attr.c
> >@@ -345,6 +345,15 @@ struct class_device_attribute *qla2x00_h
> >
> > /* Host attributes. */
> >
> >+static u64
> >+wwn_to_u64(uint8_t *wwn)
> >+{
> >+ return (u64)wwn[0] << 56 | (u64)wwn[1] << 48 |
> >+ (u64)wwn[2] << 40 | (u64)wwn[3] << 32 |
> >+ (u64)wwn[4] << 24 | (u64)wwn[5] << 16 |
> >+ (u64)wwn[6] << 8 | (u64)wwn[7];
> >+}
> >+
>
> Any reason you defined your own function instead of using the standard
> get_unaligned()?

I was unaware there was even such a helper. Anyway, the wwn_to_u64()
function adds another benefit -- clarity, were converting a 8 byte
WWN array to it's endian-agnosting 64bit value. I suppose, we could
make it inline.

--
AV
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/