Re: [PATCH 2/5] Rework stubs in security.h

[Chris Wright]

* Stephen Smalley (sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> That one isn't so much an issue as the xattr ones and vm_enough_memory
> case.  But more generally, if you think about moving toward a place
> where one can grant privileges to processes based solely on their
> role/domain, you'll need the same ability for capable and other hooks
> too.  Naturally, that can't be done safely without a lot more work on
> userspace and policy, but it is a long term goal.

Right, you've mentioned that before, thanks for bringing that up.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/