Re: [PATCH] (18/22) task_thread_info - part 2/4

[Al Viro]

On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 10:41:27AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >  
> > +static inline void setup_thread_info(struct task_struct *p, struct thread_info *ti)
> 					^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 					const struct task_struct *p?

Umm...  Wouldn't be a problem, but what does it buy?  The only caller
has p very much _not_ const pointer and since it's inlined, you won't
gain any optimizations in the caller out of it.
 
> > +{
> > +	*ti = *p->thread_info;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline unsigned long *end_of_stack(struct task_struct *p)
> 					     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 					     const struct task_struct *p?

That one is OK, but then you really want const pointer out of it.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/