Re: [PATCH] implicit declaration of function `page_cache_release'

[Olaf Hering]

 On Sat, Aug 06, David S. Miller wrote:

> From: Benoit Boissinot <bboissin@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 21:18:38 +0200
> 
> > On 8/5/05, Olaf Hering <olh@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >  On Fri, Aug 05, Benoit Boissinot wrote:
> > > 
> > > Why does it need swap.h? Do the users of pgtable.h rely on swap.h?
> > > 
> > sparc is the only architecture to do that, it looks like it uses it
> > for boot time linking (BTFIXUP_*). I don't know anything about sparc,
> > so i can't fix it.
> > 
> > (adding sparclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx to the cc list)
> 
> It needs to have the swp_entry_t type fully visible in pgtable.h,
> we can't work around this using macros.

So the patch should be reverted? Its only for CONFIG_SWAP=n, rather
unusual for KDE/GNOME tainted workstations...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/