Re: [PATCH] 6700/6702PXH quirk

From: Matthew Wilcox
Date: Sat Aug 06 2005 - 03:49:14 EST


On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 11:34:55PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> FWIW, compilers generate AWFUL code for bitfields. Bitfields are
> really tough to do optimally, whereas bit flags ["unsigned int flags &
> bitmask"] are the familiar ints and longs that the compiler is well
> tuned to optimize.

I'm sure the GCC developers would appreciate a good bug report with a
test-case that generates worse code. If you don't want to mess with their
bug tracking system, just send me a test case and I'll add it for you.

--
"Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon
the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those
conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse
to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince
himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep
he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception." -- Mark Twain
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/