Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers

[James Bruce]

Stephen Clark wrote:
> Maybe new desktop systems - but what about the tens of millions of old 
> systems that don't.

If it's an old system, it probably doesn't have working ACPI C-states 
though.  Without that, low HZ does not save you anything.  I should have 
said: 99% of desktops with the capability to do ACPI sleep have at least 
one USB device attached (usually a mouse).

I do like saving power, which is why I run cpu frequency scaling on 
every machine I have that supports it.  I'm happy because it does its 
savings without negatively impacting latency or high-load performance. 
By 2.6.14 dyntick should give us the same thing for HZ, which is why I 
think changing the maximum value now doesn't make sense.

 - Jim Bruce
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/