Re: [patch 0/15] lsm stacking v0.3: intro

[serge]

Quoting Tony Jones (tonyj@xxxxxxx):
> > Yes, after I added the unlink function, it started to seem that the
> > special cases for !CONFIG_SECURITY_STACKER wouldn't be any faster than
> > the stacker versions.  They still might be, but I'll have to think about
> > it.  If I just ditch those, then I can probably ditch the whole
> 
> Esp since James' suggestion would impact it. I'd imagine you would always want
> array[0] for this case, no?

Actually I don't think that's even needed - I just wasn't thinking right
while addressing another bug.

thanks,
-serge
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/