Re: [patch 0/15] lsm stacking v0.3: intro

From: serge
Date: Sat Jul 30 2005 - 22:54:45 EST

Quoting Tony Jones (tonyj@xxxxxxx):
> > Yes, after I added the unlink function, it started to seem that the
> > special cases for !CONFIG_SECURITY_STACKER wouldn't be any faster than
> > the stacker versions. They still might be, but I'll have to think about
> > it. If I just ditch those, then I can probably ditch the whole
> Esp since James' suggestion would impact it. I'd imagine you would always want
> array[0] for this case, no?

Actually I don't think that's even needed - I just wasn't thinking right
while addressing another bug.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at