Re: [PATCH] NMI watch dog notify patch

[Andrew Morton]

Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >I had though that too, but it does not allow recovery (i.e. lets reset 
>  >the watchdog and try again).
> 
>  die_nmi() returns to nmi_watchdog_tick(), nmi_watchdog_tick does the
>  reset and continues.  Patch below.
> 
>  >Hmm.. just looked at traps.c.  Seems die_nmi is NOT called from the nmi 
>  >trap, only from the watchdog.  Also, there is a notify in the path to 
>  >the other nmi stuff.
> 
>  I was looking at unknown_nmi_panic_callback(), which also calls
>  die_nmi().
> 
>  traps.c already has several notify_die() calls, nmi.c has none.  It is
>  cleaner to keep all the notification in traps.c, with this small change
>  to nmi.c to cope with die_nmi() returning.
> 
>  Index: linux/arch/i386/kernel/nmi.c
>  ===================================================================
>  --- linux.orig/arch/i386/kernel/nmi.c	2005-07-28 17:22:06.735038510 +1000
>  +++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/nmi.c	2005-07-29 15:19:00.371196596 +1000
>  @@ -494,8 +494,10 @@ void nmi_watchdog_tick (struct pt_regs *
>   		 * wait a few IRQs (5 seconds) before doing the oops ...
>   		 */
>   		alert_counter[cpu]++;
>  -		if (alert_counter[cpu] == 5*nmi_hz)
>  +		if (alert_counter[cpu] == 5*nmi_hz) {
>   			die_nmi(regs, "NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP");
>  +			alert_counter[cpu] = 0;
>  +		}
>   	} else {
>   		last_irq_sums[cpu] = sum;
>   		alert_counter[cpu] = 0;

That all makes sense - let's go that way?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/