Re: [PATCH][1/3] ppc32: add 440ep support
From: Domen Puncer
Date: Thu Jul 28 2005 - 08:03:26 EST
On 27/07/05 18:56 -0400, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Andrew Morton writes:
> > Matt Porter <mporter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > +static u64 dma_mask = 0xffffffffULL;
How about just DMA_32BIT_MASK from dma-mapping.h, that one has to be
> > I'm sure you're totally uninterested in this, but the above will probably
> > generate warnings on (say) ppc64, where u64 is implemented as unsigned
> > long.
> > I usually chuck a simple `-1' in there and the compiler always gets it
> > right, regardless of signedness and size and architecture.
> Umm, I think we actually want 2^32-1 not -1, don't we? In which case
> I think Matt's code is what we have to have.
> I tried a little test compile with gcc 4.0 with -m64 -Wall and it
> didn't generate a warning with the 0xffffffffULL constant.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/