Re: [ACPI] Re: [Alsa-devel] [PATCH] 2.6.13-rc3-git5: fix Bug #4416 (1/2)

[Takashi Iwai]

At Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:52:49 +0200,
Pavel Machek wrote:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> > > The following patch adds free_irq() and request_irq() to the suspend and
> > > resume, respectively, routines in the snd_intel8x0 driver.
> > 
> > The patch looks OK to me although I have some concerns.
> > 
> > - The error in resume can't be handled properly.
> > 
> >   What should we do for the error of request_irq()?
> > 
> > - Adding this to all drivers seem too much.
> 
> There's probably no other way. Talk to Len Brown.
> 
> >   We just need to stop the irq processing until resume, so something
> >   like suspend_irq(irq, dev_id) and resume_irq(irq, dev_id) would be
> >   more uesful?
> 
> Its more complex than that. Irq numbers may change during resume.

Hmm, then the patch looks wrong.  It assumes that the irq number is
as same as before suspend.

Sorry for ignorance, but, is only irq affected?  Are the other
resources like ioport consistent after resume?


Takashi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/