Re: Memory pressure handling with iSCSI

[Andrew Morton]

Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ext2 is incredibly better. Machine is very responsive. 
> 

OK.  Please, always monitor and send /proc/meminfo.  I assume that the
dirty-memory clamping is working OK with ext2 and that perhaps it'll work
OK with ext3/data=writeback.

All very odd.  I wonder how to reproduce this.  Maybe 50 ext3 filesystems
on regular old scsi will do it?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/