Re: Question re the dot releases such as

From: Gene Heskett
Date: Mon Jul 25 2005 - 16:54:44 EST

On Monday 25 July 2005 12:38, Brian Gerst wrote:
>Gene Heskett wrote:
>> Greetings;
>> I just built what I thought was, but my script got a
>> tummy ache because I didn't check the Makefile's EXTRA_VERSION,
>> which was set to .2 in the .2 patch. Now my 2.6.12 modules will
>> need a refresh build. :(
>> So whats the proper patching sequence to build a
>The dot-release patches are not incremental. You apply each one to
> the base 2.6.12 tree.
Thats what I thought, and I blew that tree away & rebuilt it again
using the same script, and it worked. Go figure...

Thanks Brian.

Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
99.35% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above
message by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at