Re: xor as a lazy comparison
From: Lee Revell
Date: Mon Jul 25 2005 - 14:22:35 EST
On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 12:16 -0700, Philippe Troin wrote:
> Lee Revell <rlrevell@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 13:55 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > Doesn't matter. The cycles saved for old compilers is not rational to
> > > have obfuscated code.
> > Where do we draw the line with this? Is x *= 2 preferable to x <<= 2 as
> > well?
> Depends if you want to multiply by 2 or 4 :-)
I guess I just answered my own question ;-)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/