Re: [PATCH] 1 Wire drivers illegally overload NETLINK_NFLOG
From: David S. Miller
Date: Sun Jul 24 2005 - 21:11:14 EST
From: Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 09:33:53 -0400
> I strongly disrecommend increasing NPROTO. Maybe we should look into
> reusing NETLINK_FIREWALL (which was an old 2.2.x kernel interface).
That is how I will fix this 1-wire case, by reusing the NETLINK_FIREWALL
> But to be honest, I don't really care all that much as long as existing
> and still very actively used values are not just overloaded.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/