Re: [PATCH] ramfs: pretend dirent sizes

[Jan Blunck]

Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> > To my understanding, you can lseek to any "proper" offset inside a
> > directory.  Proper means that the offset marks the beginning of a
> > new dirent (or end of file) in the interpretation of the filesystem.
>
>
> But you can never tell where these are in general.

I don't want to tell where these are in general, I need an easy way to 
seek to the m'th directory + offset position without reading every 
single dirent. With i_sizes != 0 it is straight forward to use "the sum 
of the m directory's i_sizes + offset" as the f_pos to seek to. For this 
purpose it is not necessary to have a "honest" i_size as long as the 
i_size is bigger than the offset of the last dirent in the directory.

> I don't see why or how this can be true in general (it might be, but I
> don't see how myself).  If we are half way through scanning a
> directory and people start messing with it we could end up somewhere
> bogus (in which case f_op->readdir I guess is expected to try and do
> something sane here?)

E.g.: ext2_validate_entry() is called if filp->f_version != 
inode->i_version.

> > Reopening the same directory may result in a formerly proper offset
> > isn't anymore.

Which is a user problem again. Might be that you are opening a different 
directory with the same name ... or even a regular file!

Jan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/