Re: sata_sil 3112 activity LED patch

[Jens Axboe]

On Wed, Jul 06 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Aric Cyr wrote:
> >After finally getting fed up with not having my activity light working
> >for my SATA drives, I came up with a small patch (more like hack) to
> >make it work.  It works quite well, but I'm afraid that there are many
> >restriction that this patch does not check for that it probably
> >should... so consider this a work-in-progress.  My information is
> >based on a document from Silicon Image that appears to no longer be
> >available on their website (Sil-AN-0082-E; 8112-0082.pdf).  I still
> >have a copy if anyone is interested.
> >
> >There are two restrictions that are not checked:
> >
> >1) Is the chip a 3112 or 3114?  I assume that this would only work on
> >   a 3112, but whether it is "a bad thing" on a 3114 I do not know.
> >
> >2) BAR5 + 0x54 is apparently used for the flash memory address and
> >   data lines.  However for most motherboards (i.e. not add-on cards)
> >   with the chip, like my EPOX 8RDA3+, there is no flash memory, so
> >   these lines are hijacked as LED GPIO.  I assume that this is a
> >   common practice for motherboard makers using the sil3112 since
> >   Silicon Image went out of their way to produce the above mentioned
> >   document.  Anyways, the problem is that this patch does not check
> >   if flash memory is installed or not before twiddling with the GPIO
> >   lines.  This could be extremely bad for people running the 3112
> >   from add-on cards (or any implementation with flash memory
> >   installed).
> >
> >Setting the low 8bits at BAR5+54h seems to enable the LED circuit.  It
> >seems that this circuit is patched through into the motherboard as it
> >lights the regular hard drive light on the front of my case.  Setting
> >bits [8:15] at BAR5+54h clears the bits, disabling the LED.  I hooked
> >this logic into the ata_bmdma_start and ata_bmdma_stop which were made
> >into simple wrapper functions in sata_sil.c that just set the GPIO
> >bits and calls ata_bmdma_*.
> 
> I don't think its ugly, necessarily.  I do worry about the flash memory 
> stuff, though, which is why I don't want to merge this upstream for now.
> 
> For your patch specifically, it would be nice to follow the coding style 
> that is found in the rest of the driver (single-tab indents, etc., read 
> CodingStyle in kernel source tree).

There's also an existing variant of this in the block layer, the
activity_fn, that we use on the ibook/powerbook to use the sleep led as
an activity light. Just in case you prefer that to overloading the bmdma
start/stop handlers.

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/