Re: [0/48] Suspend2 2.1.9.8 for 2.6.12

[Nigel Cunningham]

Hi.

On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 22:04, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > I've been thinking about this some more and wondering whether I should
> > just replace swsusp. I really don't want to step on your toes though.
> > What would you like to see happen?
> 
> Do you implement the entire swsusp userspace interface? If not, removing
> it probably isn't a reasonable plan without fair warning.

I'm not suggesting removing the sysfs interface or replacing system to
ram - just the suspend to disk part.

Regards,

Nigel
-- 
Evolution.
Enumerate the requirements.
Consider the interdependencies.
Calculate the probabilities.
Be amazed that people believe it happened. 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/