Re: reiser4 plugins

[Horst von Brand]

Hans Reiser <reiser@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

[...]

> I think the exokernel approach by Frans is a very interesting approach. 
> I wish I had the experience with it necessary to know if it was
> effective.  I do NOT take the position that name resolution should be in
> the kernel.  I DO take the position that it should be either in the
> kernel or out of the kernel, and should constitute one cohesive and
> coherent body of code.

Right.

>                         If someone talks Linus into trying the exokernel
> approach,

Are you nuts?! Such radical experiments do /not/ belong in the kernel on
which millions of machines depend!

Go and fork off a branch to play around with this, and if it does show real
promise, you can then come back and try to integrate this into the official
kernel.

>           I will be happy to educate myself to where I have an opinion
> on whether that works.  It is easy to see powerful advantages to the
> exokernel approach: I wish I understood the security model for it, and I
> wish I was sure that name resolution would not require too many context
> switches as one fetches each storage component required by a name
> resolution.

Exactly the kinds of questions that have to get solid answers before any
experimental patches can get off the ground.
-- 
Dr. Horst H. von Brand                   User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica                     Fono: +56 32 654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria              +56 32 654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile                Fax:  +56 32 797513
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/