Re: [0/48] Suspend2 2.1.9.8 for 2.6.12

[Nigel Cunningham]

Hi again.

On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 18:22, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Is swsusp1 expected to be functional after these are applied? You
> removed *some* of its hooks, but not all, so I'm confused.

I've been thinking about this some more and wondering whether I should
just replace swsusp. I really don't want to step on your toes though.
What would you like to see happen?

Regards,

Nigel
-- 
Evolution.
Enumerate the requirements.
Consider the interdependencies.
Calculate the probabilities.
Be amazed that people believe it happened. 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/